Skip to content
Free tool · Updated 2 Oct 2026

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5

Pick two to four models to compare benchmark scores, prices, context windows and speed. The link updates as you pick, so you can share the exact comparison.

Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5

Cheapest blended

Claude Opus 5

$10.00 / 1M tokens

Largest context

Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5

Tie at 1M tokens

Fastest output

Claude Fable 5.1

68 tokens/s

Top on Terminal-Bench 4.0

Claude Fable 5.1

55.8%

Specifications

SpecClaude Fable 5AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicClaude Opus 5Anthropic
ProviderAnthropicAnthropicAnthropic
Released9 Jun 20261 Sep 202624 Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens1M tokens1M tokens
Max output128K tokens128K tokens128K tokens
Input / 1M$10.00*$10.00*$5.00*
Output / 1M$50.00$50.00$25.00
Cached input / 1M$1.00$0.25$0.50
Speed–68 tokens/s55 tokens/s
Input typestext, imagetext, imagetext, image
Best forReasoningAgentsCodingResearchReasoningAgentsCodingResearchCodingAgentsReasoning

* Claude Fable 5: Legacy; Fable 5.1 has the same input/output price but cache reads at $0.25 instead of $1. Uses the newer tokenizer (about 30% more tokens than pre-Opus 4.7 models). Safety classifiers can refuse; since 24 Sep 2026 some pre-output refusal categories are billed. Minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens.

* Claude Fable 5.1: Cache reads are 0.025x base input ($0.25), down from $1 on Fable 5. Uses the newer tokenizer (about 30% more tokens than pre-Opus 4.7 models for the same text). Safety classifiers can refuse; since 24 Sep 2026 pre-output refusals in the bio, frontier_llm and reasoning_extraction categories are billed. Minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens.

* Claude Opus 5: Legacy; Opus 5.5 is cheaper ($4/$20). Fast mode (research preview, Claude API only): $10 input / $50 output. Uses the newer tokenizer. Safety classifiers can refuse; since 24 Sep 2026 some pre-output refusal categories are billed. Minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens.

Benchmark scores

Officially reported scores only. A model with no published score on a benchmark shows a line, not a zero.

Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5
Terminal-Bench 4.042%55.8%52.3%
OSWorld 2.072.9%77.9% no published score
Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools)57.8%60.9%56.6%
Humanity’s Last Exam (with tools)63.8%65%63.6%
AutomationBench17.1%31.4%26.9%
FrontierCode 1.1 no published score50.3%48%

Price per 1M tokens

Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5
Input$10.00$10.00$5.00
Output$50.00$50.00$25.00
Cached input$1.00$0.25$0.50

Context window and speed

Claude Fable 5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5
Context1M1M1M
Tokens/s no published score6855

Notes

Claude Fable 5
Legacy model, superseded by Claude Fable 5.1. Built for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work; Anthropic called it a Mythos-class model made safe for general use.
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic's top generally available model, for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work. Successor to Claude Fable 5 at the same input and output prices, with stronger long-running agentic coding, multistep research and document work.
Claude Opus 5
Legacy Opus model, superseded by Claude Opus 5.5. Anthropic described it as coming close to Claude Fable 5's intelligence at half the price, designed for everyday use.

Still torn between two?

Test them on your own prompts.

Benchmarks are someone else’s work. On a free call we look at yours and agree how to check quality, cost and latency for the models you are weighing.