Skip to content
Free tool · Updated 2 Oct 2026

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra

Pick two to four models to compare benchmark scores, prices, context windows and speed. The link updates as you pick, so you can share the exact comparison.

Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra

Cheapest blended

Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra

Tie at $20.00 / 1M tokens

Largest context

GPT-6 Astra

1.05M tokens

Fastest output

Claude Fable 5.1

68 tokens/s

Top on Terminal-Bench 4.0

GPT-6 Astra

57.9%

Specifications

SpecClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicGPT-6 AstraOpenAI
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Released1 Sep 20263 Sep 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens1.05M tokens
Max output128K tokens128K tokens
Input / 1M$10.00*$10.00*
Output / 1M$50.00$50.00
Cached input / 1M$0.25$1.00
Speed68 tokens/s51 tokens/s
Input typestext, imagetext, image
Best forReasoningAgentsCodingResearchCodingAgentsReasoningResearch

* Claude Fable 5.1: Cache reads are 0.025x base input ($0.25), down from $1 on Fable 5. Uses the newer tokenizer (about 30% more tokens than pre-Opus 4.7 models for the same text). Safety classifiers can refuse; since 24 Sep 2026 pre-output refusals in the bio, frontier_llm and reasoning_extraction categories are billed. Minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens.

* GPT-6 Astra: Cache writes are 1.25x input; cache reads 0.1x; 30-minute minimum cache life. Batch and Flex: $5 in / $25 out. Fast mode (formerly Priority): 2x, $20 / $100. Ultrafast (Responses API, service_tier "ultrafast", Astra only): $60 in / $6 cached / $75 cache write / $300 out. Data residency endpoints +10%.

Benchmark scores

Officially reported scores only. A model with no published score on a benchmark shows a line, not a zero.

Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra
Terminal-Bench 4.055.8%57.9%
OSWorld 2.077.9%72.6%
Humanity’s Last Exam (with tools)65%57.2%
AutomationBench31.4%41.4%

Price per 1M tokens

Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra
Input$10.00$10.00
Output$50.00$50.00
Cached input$0.25$1.00

Context window and speed

Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra
Context1M1.05M
Tokens/s6851

Notes

Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic's top generally available model, for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work. Successor to Claude Fable 5 at the same input and output prices, with stronger long-running agentic coding, multistep research and document work.
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI's most capable model, for the hardest end-to-end work: complex reasoning, coding, computer use, research and document creation.

Still torn between two?

Test them on your own prompts.

Benchmarks are someone else’s work. On a free call we look at yours and agree how to check quality, cost and latency for the models you are weighing.