Skip to content
Free tool · Updated 2 Oct 2026

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Fable 5

Pick two to four models to compare benchmark scores, prices, context windows and speed. The link updates as you pick, so you can share the exact comparison.

Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5

Cheapest blended

Claude Opus 5

$10.00 / 1M tokens

Largest context

Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5

Tie at 1M tokens

Fastest output

Claude Fable 5.1

68 tokens/s

Top on Terminal-Bench 4.0

Claude Fable 5.1

55.8%

Specifications

SpecClaude Opus 5AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1AnthropicClaude Fable 5Anthropic
ProviderAnthropicAnthropicAnthropic
Released24 Jul 20261 Sep 20269 Jun 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens1M tokens1M tokens
Max output128K tokens128K tokens128K tokens
Input / 1M$5.00*$10.00*$10.00*
Output / 1M$25.00$50.00$50.00
Cached input / 1M$0.50$0.25$1.00
Speed55 tokens/s68 tokens/s–
Input typestext, imagetext, imagetext, image
Best forCodingAgentsReasoningReasoningAgentsCodingResearchReasoningAgentsCodingResearch

* Claude Opus 5: Legacy; Opus 5.5 is cheaper ($4/$20). Fast mode (research preview, Claude API only): $10 input / $50 output. Uses the newer tokenizer. Safety classifiers can refuse; since 24 Sep 2026 some pre-output refusal categories are billed. Minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens.

* Claude Fable 5.1: Cache reads are 0.025x base input ($0.25), down from $1 on Fable 5. Uses the newer tokenizer (about 30% more tokens than pre-Opus 4.7 models for the same text). Safety classifiers can refuse; since 24 Sep 2026 pre-output refusals in the bio, frontier_llm and reasoning_extraction categories are billed. Minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens.

* Claude Fable 5: Legacy; Fable 5.1 has the same input/output price but cache reads at $0.25 instead of $1. Uses the newer tokenizer (about 30% more tokens than pre-Opus 4.7 models). Safety classifiers can refuse; since 24 Sep 2026 some pre-output refusal categories are billed. Minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens.

Benchmark scores

Officially reported scores only. A model with no published score on a benchmark shows a line, not a zero.

Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5
Terminal-Bench 4.052.3%55.8%42%
FrontierCode 1.148%50.3% no published score
AutomationBench26.9%31.4%17.1%
Humanity’s Last Exam (with tools)63.6%65%63.8%
Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools)56.6%60.9%57.8%
OSWorld 2.0 no published score77.9%72.9%

Price per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5
Input$5.00$10.00$10.00
Output$25.00$50.00$50.00
Cached input$0.50$0.25$1.00

Context window and speed

Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1Claude Fable 5
Context1M1M1M
Tokens/s5568 no published score

Notes

Claude Opus 5
Legacy Opus model, superseded by Claude Opus 5.5. Anthropic described it as coming close to Claude Fable 5's intelligence at half the price, designed for everyday use.
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic's top generally available model, for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work. Successor to Claude Fable 5 at the same input and output prices, with stronger long-running agentic coding, multistep research and document work.
Claude Fable 5
Legacy model, superseded by Claude Fable 5.1. Built for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work; Anthropic called it a Mythos-class model made safe for general use.

Still torn between two?

Test them on your own prompts.

Benchmarks are someone else’s work. On a free call we look at yours and agree how to check quality, cost and latency for the models you are weighing.