Skip to content
Free tool · Updated 2 Oct 2026

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1

Pick two to four models to compare benchmark scores, prices, context windows and speed. The link updates as you pick, so you can share the exact comparison.

Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1

Cheapest blended

Claude Sonnet 5

$4.00 / 1M tokens

Largest context

Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1

Tie at 1M tokens

Fastest output

Claude Sonnet 5

85 tokens/s

Top on Terminal-Bench 4.0

Claude Fable 5.1

55.8%

Specifications

SpecClaude Sonnet 5AnthropicClaude Opus 5AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1Anthropic
ProviderAnthropicAnthropicAnthropic
Released30 Jun 202624 Jul 20261 Sep 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M tokens1M tokens1M tokens
Max output128K tokens128K tokens128K tokens
Input / 1M$2.00*$5.00*$10.00*
Output / 1M$10.00$25.00$50.00
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.50$0.25
Speed85 tokens/s55 tokens/s68 tokens/s
Input typestext, imagetext, imagetext, image
Best forCodingAgentsBudgetCodingAgentsReasoningReasoningAgentsCodingResearch

* Claude Sonnet 5: $2/$10 launched as introductory pricing through 31 Aug 2026 and is now the standard price; the planned rise to $3/$15 on 1 Sep 2026 did not happen. Uses the newer tokenizer (launch post: roughly 1.0–1.35x more tokens depending on content). Minimum cacheable prompt: 1,024 tokens.

* Claude Opus 5: Legacy; Opus 5.5 is cheaper ($4/$20). Fast mode (research preview, Claude API only): $10 input / $50 output. Uses the newer tokenizer. Safety classifiers can refuse; since 24 Sep 2026 some pre-output refusal categories are billed. Minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens.

* Claude Fable 5.1: Cache reads are 0.025x base input ($0.25), down from $1 on Fable 5. Uses the newer tokenizer (about 30% more tokens than pre-Opus 4.7 models for the same text). Safety classifiers can refuse; since 24 Sep 2026 pre-output refusals in the bio, frontier_llm and reasoning_extraction categories are billed. Minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens.

Benchmark scores

Officially reported scores only. A model with no published score on a benchmark shows a line, not a zero.

Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1
Terminal-Bench 4.010.3%52.3%55.8%
FrontierCode 1.142.4%48%50.3%
Humanity’s Last Exam (with tools)54.9%63.6%65%
AutomationBench no published score26.9%31.4%
Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools) no published score56.6%60.9%

Price per 1M tokens

Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1
Input$2.00$5.00$10.00
Output$10.00$25.00$50.00
Cached input$0.20$0.50$0.25

Context window and speed

Claude Sonnet 5Claude Opus 5Claude Fable 5.1
Context1M1M1M
Tokens/s855568

Notes

Claude Sonnet 5
Legacy Sonnet model, superseded by Claude Sonnet 5.5. Anthropic called it the most agentic Sonnet model yet, with performance close to Opus 4.8 at lower prices.
Claude Opus 5
Legacy Opus model, superseded by Claude Opus 5.5. Anthropic described it as coming close to Claude Fable 5's intelligence at half the price, designed for everyday use.
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic's top generally available model, for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work. Successor to Claude Fable 5 at the same input and output prices, with stronger long-running agentic coding, multistep research and document work.

Still torn between two?

Test them on your own prompts.

Benchmarks are someone else’s work. On a free call we look at yours and agree how to check quality, cost and latency for the models you are weighing.