Skip to content

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Google · Released 21 Jul 2026 · gemini-3.5-flash-lite

Compare this model
ProprietaryBudgetAgents

$0.30

Input price / 1M tokens

#9 of 61, cheapest first

$2.50

Output price / 1M tokens

#14 of 61, cheapest first

1.05M

Context window

#11 of 71

360

Output tokens / second

#1 of 61

54.2%

SWE-bench Pro

#14 of 16

54%

Terminal-Bench 2.1

#17 of 17

74%

OSWorld-Verified

#7 of 8

74.5%

CharXiv Reasoning

#5 of 6

Summary

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is a proprietary model from Google, released on 21 Jul 2026.

At $0.30 input and $2.50 output per million tokens, it is #9 of 61 on input price, cheapest first.

Its 1.05M-token context window ranks #11 of 71.

Measured output speed is 360 tokens per second, #1 of 61.

Low-latency, cost-efficient multimodal model for high-volume agentic sub-tasks, translation, document parsing and simple data processing.

Benchmarks · 7 reported

BenchmarkScoreBarRankSource
SWE-bench Prohigh thinking, internal Antigravity harness54.2%#14 of 16Google Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite evaluation reportSelf-reported
Terminal-Bench 2.1high thinking, Terminus 2 harness54%#17 of 17Google Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite evaluation reportSelf-reported
MLE-BenchPartial-30 subset, average position score39.2%–Google Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite evaluation reportSelf-reported
GDPVal-AA v2Artificial Analysis leaderboard, Jul 20261,140Elo-style–Artificial Analysis, cited in Google's evaluation report
OSWorld-Verifiedaverage of 5 runs, max 100 steps74%#7 of 8Google Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite evaluation reportSelf-reported
CharXiv Reasoningno tools (76.5% with search and code execution)74.5%#5 of 6Google Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite evaluation reportSelf-reported
MRCR v2 (8-needle)128k average (21.3% at 1M pointwise)72.2%#6 of 13Google Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite evaluation reportSelf-reported

Self-reported means the lab ran the test itself. A rank appears only where several labs report the same version of a benchmark.

Similar models

Models with the most benchmarks in common with Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite, and the closest scores.

Compare 4 side by side

SWE-bench Pro

#14 of 16

Harder multi-file engineering tasks

Terminal-Bench 2.1

#17 of 17

Terminal tasks, earlier set

OSWorld-Verified

#7 of 8

Using a desktop computer

CharXiv Reasoning

#5 of 6

Reading charts from research papers

Compare Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite side by side

Pre-filled with the two closest models. Swap any of them.

Open comparison

Sources

Building on Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

Get the architecture right before the bill arrives.

We size caching, routing and fallbacks for your workload on a free call, and tell you where a cheaper model is good enough.